Notre Dame lacrosse player Matt Landis and National Championship Semifinals

Matt Landis

Matt Landis is a learner as well as a starting player on Notre Dame lacrosse team. The Pelham, NY inborn exhibits impressive devotion both when on and also off the playing ground, striking equilibrium between his work and play. As an academic-athlete at Notre dame, Matt Landis does Finance, is a lead defenseman on Fighting Irish Lacrosse team, does a part-time job and someway is able to get time to live like an ordinary 20+ year-old American kid. 

Matt Landis’s hobbies are; doing voluntary work, playing golf, hiking, reading, skiing as well as skeet shooting. 

Matt Landis
Matt interviews after the game.

It was heartbreaking for Lacrosse team of the top-seeded University of Notre Dame on the afternoon of last Saturday during its 2015 NCAA Championship countrywide semifinal match versus Denver, which was played on Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia. 

Wesley Berg’s score with 2:03 remaining in extra time raised the No.4 seed forerunners to 11-10 option over Irish. Berg’s goal came following Notre Dame assembled from a 4-goal deficit (10-6) with 4:23 remaining in the competition.

Sophomore midfielder Sergio Perkovic demonstrated to be unrelenting during the last 15-minute stanza when he scored 5 of his scores in the 4th quarter. Perkovic complemented his career-high with a 5-goal performance he achieved the previous year in 2014 after Notre Dame was defeated by Duke in national championship match. 

The Irish, whose second consecutive appearance was their program-first in national semifinals alongside 5th overall attendance in Championship Weekend, saw their term get to its end at 12-3. The Pioneers upgrade to 16-2 proceeding to their tournament title matchup having No.6 seed Maryland on Monday. 

Lacrosse’s head coach, Kevin Corrigan said that he did not think they played specifically well in particular parts of the match. However, they did what they ought to do so as to attain a one-play match at the conclusion. 

Saturday’s tournament concluded much similar to the initial game between the 2 teams on 7th March in Denver where Pioneers assembled for the match-winner with 3:18 remaining in extra time for a comparable 11-10 victory. Today’s semifinal match-up between Irish and Pioneers was 20th all-time contest although first in NCAA Championship game. 

Denver’s prolonged its victory streak on 3 straight over Notre Dame. Actually, the match marked the 4th time in last 5 meetings, which the tournament was decided in extra time. 

The Pioneers escalated to 2-0 early 3:56 into the 1st quarter on scores by Tyler Pace alongside Jack Bobzien.

Notre Dame tied the match at 2-2 from scores of Jim Marlatt as well as Conor Doyle with 7:32 plus 4:30, in that order, left in the 1st quarter. 

Denver’s Zach Miller placed the Pioneers up 3-2 5:52 towards the 2nd quarter on 1st of his 2 scores, though Notre Dame hit back fast after Osselo obtained his 1st goal of the match 52 seconds later. 

Connor Cannizzaro, completed the match with a score for Pioneers with 6:51 remaining in the 2nd quarter to place Denver up 4-3.

Wikipedia Writing and Editing

CLOSING IN ON THE GENDER GAP

For far too long, men have ruled the roost when it comes to writing and editing. We women have been left out in the cold. Many feel we have nothing valuable to contribute on Wikipedia. In truth, we do. We see things from a different perspective. I feel it is high time more women took over the writing/editing gender gap for Wikipedia.

With that being, there are a few things which need to be discussed. I say this as one woman to another. Women can be hugely successful on Wikipedia, we just have to remember a few things.

IT’S NOT ABOUT US

We have been feeling lack of empowerment for far too long. Due to this, some of us like to springboard into action. We do one of two things. We either think too much or don’t use our heads enough. In other words, we allow our emotions to drive the car. There are so many subjects that we can relate to, but it needs to be done in a constructive manner. I am a woman and have been very successful with Wikipedia. I encourage other women to take these tips to heart.

You know how we are always telling men “It’s not always about you.” Same rules apply here with us. It’s not about us, even in the writing/editing process. We must find a way to get our points across, without including our egos says getyourwiki.com.

Another lesson, only include the facts. This is not about our opinion, it’s not even about my opinion. Opinions don’t matter here. Your readers only want to read the cold, hard facts. Unless you have some major awareness of what you are writing about, don’t write about it.

The biggest mistake some of us make is we let our personal feelings get involved. I have also made this mistake in the beginning. Learn from this. Just do the research and contribute what you have learned. In a way you have to play the game. In a way you have to think like a man. Sometimes you have to do this to get ahead.

Another thing we need to limit is how much we care. Let’s be honest, guys just don’t care. Guys don’t get involved. Guys just do the job and that is it. We women get more emotionally involved in the writing/editing process. The more we limit our involvement, the more successful we will be with Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and You

When it comes to the internet there are thousands upon thousands of articles and pieces of content published every day. That being said, there are also plenty of false articles out there that can often confuse readers. Wikipedia is notorious for articles that may be less than factual and as a reader this can be frustrating. When you’re looking to Get Your Wiki, there are a few tips for making your own Wikipedia entry that can help you to insure it is factual and well written to keep readers interested and informed.

1. Sources- the most important part of any article are your sources. If you are writing about something that you are not an expert in you need to make sure you have some credible sources from which to draw your information. As a general rule, three or more is a good number for sources. Try to find sources that come from .gov, .edu, and .org sites as these are more highly regulated and fact checked.

2. Outline- it is always best to start with an outline before you begin to write. Not only will this help you to organize your thoughts but it will also help you to get your article into the appropriate format. Nearly all Wikipedia articles are written in an outline format to make for easy navigation and easy reading. This will also help you in the submission process as you work to publish your article. You should write your outline to help get your thoughts together and give direction to your topic.

3. Writing Style- the last issue that you want to consider is your writing style. This is going to make a huge difference in how you work on your article and how it ends up. You should try for a professional style that lets readers know that you have researched your topic and that you know what you are talking about. You should also try to be conversational enough that readers will not lose interest and so that they will continue to read your work. It is always best to adopt a semi formal style so that you can let readers know you are prepared without coming off as cut and dry which can be very boring.